Crowdsourced Data100% Free

Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost vs Segway MUXI Cargo eBike

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost

Engwe

EP-2 3.0 Boost

54
Overall

$1,295

View full specs →
VS
Segway MUXI Cargo eBike

Segway

MUXI Cargo eBike

54
Overall

$1,699

View full specs →
Too close to call — scores within 5 points

Why choose one over the other?

Segway MUXI Cargo eBike wins most measured dimensions, led by Build Quality (43 vs 0).

Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost is $404 cheaper and scores as high or higher overall — the value pick.

Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost wins on

No dimension leads — see the spec table.

Segway MUXI Cargo eBike wins on

  • Build Quality: 43 vs 0
  • Safety: 9 vs 0

Compare the full spec table below to weigh the trade-offs for your use case.

SpecEngwe EP-2 3.0 BoostSegway MUXI Cargo eBike
Drivetrain
Peak Power
Continuous Power
Max Torque
Top Speed37 km/h
Max Incline
Drive Config
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity648 Wh717 Wh
Amp Hours
Charge Time
Claimed Range120 km128.8 km
Cell Chemistry
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight32.3 kg33 kg
Max Payload
Deck Length
Deck Width
Ground Clearance
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
Suspension
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front Brake
Rear Brake
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIPX7
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: build quality — the Segway MUXI Cargo eBike leads by 43 points. Both scooters score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. For riders who prioritise speed, the Segway MUXI Cargo eBike is the clear choice.

Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost vs Segway MUXI Cargo eBikeEngwe EP-2 3.0 Boost

The Engwe EP-2 3.0 Boost (54/100) and Segway MUXI Cargo eBike (54/100) score nearly the same overall. Both scooters are closely matched — check the spec table above to find the best fit for your riding style.

More Comparisons