Crowdsourced Data100% Free

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin G2

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

Apollo Phantom 2.0

Apollo

Phantom 2.0

68
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
VS
KuKirin G2

KuKirin

G2

23
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 67.9 vs 23.5 points

Why choose one over the other?

AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.

SpecApollo Phantom 2.0KuKirin G2
Drivetrain
Peak Power3.5 kW600 W
Continuous Power3.1 kW500 W
Max Torque29 Nm
Top Speed70.8 km/h25 km/h
Max Incline25 °20 °
Drive ConfigDual
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity1404 Wh749 Wh
Amp Hours27 Ah15.6 Ah
Charge Time8.5 h
Claimed Range80.5 km65 km
Cell ChemistryLithium-ionLithium-ion 18650
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight46.3 kg29.4 kg
Max Payload149.7 kg120 kg
Deck Length
Deck Width
Ground Clearance17.8 cm18 cm
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter11"10"
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
SuspensionDualNone
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front BrakeDisc
Rear BrakeDisc
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIP66IPX4
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes2
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty12 months

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: power — the Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads by 73 points. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the KuKirin G2. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin G2Apollo Phantom 2.0

The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scores higher overall (68 vs 23/100). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads on claimed range (81 km vs 65 km for the KuKirin G2). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.

More Comparisons