NIU KQi 200P vs TEVERUN SPACE LITE
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 TEVERUN SPACE LITE wins overall — 57.6 vs 39.1 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | NIU KQi 200P | TEVERUN SPACE LITE |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 700 W | 1.2 kW ✓ |
| Continuous Power | 350 W | 800 W ✓ |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 32.2 km/h | 45 km/h ✓ |
| Max Incline | 11.3 ° | 25 ° ✓ |
| Drive Config | Rear | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 365 Wh | 936 Wh ✓ |
| Amp Hours | 7.8 Ah | 18 Ah ✓ |
| Charge Time | — | 10 h |
| Claimed Range | 54.1 km | 60 km ✓ |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | — |
| Removable Battery | — | — |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | — |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 19.7 kg ✓ | 30 kg |
| Max Payload | 120.2 kg ✓ | 100 kg |
| Deck Length | 48 cm | — |
| Deck Width | 13.5 cm | — |
| Ground Clearance | 8.9 cm | — |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 10" | 10" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✗ | — |
| Suspension | Front | Dual |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | — |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Drum | Disc |
| Rear Brake | None | Disc |
| Front Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | — |
| IP Rating | IPX5 | IPX6 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | 3 |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| OTA Updates | ✗ | — |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | — |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | — |
| Warranty | — | 12 months |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: power — the TEVERUN SPACE LITE leads by 43 points. The TEVERUN SPACE LITE pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the NIU KQi 200P. For riders who prioritise speed, the TEVERUN SPACE LITE is the clear choice.
NIU KQi 200P vs TEVERUN SPACE LITE — NIU KQi 200P
The TEVERUN SPACE LITE scores higher overall (58 vs 39/100). The TEVERUN SPACE LITE reaches 45 km/h top speed. See the spec table above for the full comparison.
