Ridstar MN-26 vs Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike
Side-by-side eBike comparison · Specs, scores & verdict
VS
🏆 Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike wins overall — 50.7 vs 41.0 points
Full Specs Comparison
⚡ Motor & Power
Hub-drive-rear
Motor Type
Hub-drive-rear
1500 W✓
Nominal Power
—
—
Peak Power
✓750 W
—
Torque
✓57 Nm
—
PAS Levels
✓5
—
Throttle
✗ No
—
Max Assist Speed
✓25.0 km/h
🔋 Battery & Range
960 Wh✓
Battery Capacity
720 Wh
90 km
Claimed Range
✓150 km
✓ Yes
Removable Battery
✓ Yes
🚲 Frame & Fit
—
Frame Style
Step-through
Aluminum
Frame Material
Steel
37 kg
Weight
✓31 kg
150 kg✓
Max Payload
120 kg
🔧 Suspension
—
Front Travel
✓55 mm
—
Rear Suspension
None
—
Seatpost Suspension
✗ No
⚙️ Drivetrain & Brakes
7-speed
Gears
7-speed
Mechanical-disc
Brake Type
Mechanical-disc
—
Rotor Size (F)
✓180 mm
🛞 Wheels & Tires
26.0"
Wheel Size
20.0"
4.00"
Tire Width
4.00"
Fat
Tire Type
Fat
📱 Tech & Features
Lcd
Display
Lcd
None
Connectivity
—
✓ Yes
Lights
✓ Yes
✓ Yes✓
Rear Rack
✗ No
✓ Yes
Fenders
✓ Yes
—
Walk Assist
✓✓ Yes
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: range — the Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike leads by 21 points. The Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike edges out the Ridstar MN-26 on our overall score, though both are competitive eBikes. If range is your priority, the Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike will take you further per charge.
Ridstar MN-26 vs Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike — Ridstar MN-26
The Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike scores higher overall (51 vs 41/100). The Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike leads on claimed range (150 km vs 90 km for the Ridstar MN-26). The Touroll Touroll S2/S2 Pro Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike is $240 cheaper.
