Ridstar MN-26 vs VOLTCYCLE M3
Side-by-side eBike comparison · Specs, scores & verdict
Too close to call — scores within 5 points
Full Specs Comparison
⚡ Motor & Power
Hub-drive-rear
Motor Type
Hub-drive-rear
1500 W✓
Nominal Power
750 W
—
Max Assist Speed
✓45.0 km/h
🔋 Battery & Range
960 Wh✓
Battery Capacity
874 Wh
90 km
Claimed Range
90 km
✓ Yes
Removable Battery
✓ Yes
🚲 Frame & Fit
—
Frame Style
Step-over
Aluminum
Frame Material
Steel
37 kg✓
Weight
39.3 kg
150 kg
Max Payload
150 kg
⚙️ Drivetrain & Brakes
7-speed
Gears
7-speed
Mechanical-disc
Brake Type
Mechanical-disc
🛞 Wheels & Tires
26.0"
Wheel Size
20.0"
4.00"
Tire Width
4.00"
Fat
Tire Type
Fat
📱 Tech & Features
Lcd
Display
—
None
Connectivity
None
✓ Yes
Lights
✓ Yes
✓ Yes✓
Rear Rack
—
✓ Yes✓
Fenders
—
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: motor — the VOLTCYCLE M3 leads by 20 points. Both eBikes score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. The VOLTCYCLE M3 is the more affordable option; the Ridstar MN-26 commands a premium for its extra capability.
Ridstar MN-26 vs VOLTCYCLE M3 — Ridstar MN-26
The Ridstar MN-26 (41/100) and VOLTCYCLE M3 (39/100) score nearly the same overall. The VOLTCYCLE M3 is $442 cheaper.
