Ausom L1 vs Segway MAX G3
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 Segway MAX G3 wins overall — 80.4 vs 62.8 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | Ausom L1 | Segway MAX G3 |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 1.1 kW | 2.0 kW ✓ |
| Continuous Power | 800 W | 850 W ✓ |
| Max Torque | 27 Nm | — |
| Top Speed | 45 km/h | 45 km/h |
| Max Incline | — | 30 ° |
| Drive Config | Rear | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 749 Wh ✓ | 597 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 15.6 Ah ✓ | 12.75 Ah |
| Charge Time | 11 h | 3.5 h ✓ |
| Claimed Range | 70 km | 80 km ✓ |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | Li-Ion |
| Removable Battery | — | — |
| Regen Braking | ✗ | ✓ |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 28.2 kg | 24.6 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 130 kg | 130 kg |
| Deck Length | 51.5 cm | — |
| Deck Width | 19 cm | — |
| Ground Clearance | 18 cm | — |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 10" | 11" ✓ |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Suspension | Dual | Dual |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | ✓ |
| Seat | ✗ | — |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Front Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IPX6 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✗ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | 3 | 3 |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | — | ✓ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✓ | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: comfort — the Segway MAX G3 leads by 40 points. The Segway MAX G3 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the Ausom L1. For portability and easy carrying, the Segway MAX G3 is the better pick.
Ausom L1 vs Segway MAX G3 — Ausom L1
The Segway MAX G3 scores higher overall (80 vs 63/100). Both scooters are closely matched — check the spec table above to find the best fit for your riding style.
