Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs Engwe Y400
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 67.9 vs 24.3 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | Apollo Phantom 2.0 | Engwe Y400 |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 3.5 kW | — |
| Continuous Power | 3.1 kW ✓ | 750 W |
| Max Torque | — | 28 Nm |
| Top Speed | 70.8 km/h ✓ | 25 km/h |
| Max Incline | 25 ° ✓ | 15 ° |
| Drive Config | Dual | — |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1404 Wh ✓ | 499 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 27 Ah | — |
| Charge Time | — | 8 h |
| Claimed Range | 80.5 km ✓ | 50 km |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | — |
| Removable Battery | — | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | — |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 46.3 kg | 24.6 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 149.7 kg ✓ | 120 kg |
| Deck Length | — | — |
| Deck Width | — | — |
| Ground Clearance | 17.8 cm | — |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 11" ✓ | 10" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✓ | — |
| Suspension | Dual | Front |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | — |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Disc | — |
| Rear Brake | Disc | — |
| Front Lights | ✓ | — |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | — |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | — |
| IP Rating | IP66 | — |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | ✗ | — |
| OTA Updates | ✗ | — |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | — |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | — |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: power — the Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads by 73 points. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the Engwe Y400. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.
Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs Engwe Y400 — Apollo Phantom 2.0
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scores higher overall (68 vs 24/100). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads on claimed range (81 km vs 50 km for the Engwe Y400). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.
