Inokim OXO vs VIVI PONY01
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
Too close to call — scores within 5 points
Why choose one over the other?
Inokim OXO and VIVI PONY01 score evenly across the dimensions we measure — the choice comes down to price and specifics.
Inokim OXO wins on
No dimension leads — see the spec table.
VIVI PONY01 wins on
No dimension leads — see the spec table.
Compare the full spec table below to weigh the trade-offs for your use case.
| Spec | Inokim OXO | VIVI PONY01 |
|---|---|---|
⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | — | — |
| Continuous Power | 1.0 kW | — |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 60 km/h ✓ | 32 km/h |
| Max Incline | — | — |
| Drive Config | Dual | — |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | — |
🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1540 Wh ✓ | 374 Wh |
| Amp Hours | — | — |
| Charge Time | 12 h | — |
| Claimed Range | 70 km ✓ | 64.4 km |
| Cell Chemistry | — | — |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | — |
| Regen Braking | ✗ | — |
📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 33.5 kg | 19.5 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 120 kg | — |
| Deck Length | — | — |
| Deck Width | — | — |
| Ground Clearance | — | — |
| Foldable | ✓ | — |
🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 10" | — |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | — |
| Puncture Resistant | — | — |
| Suspension | — | — |
| Adjustable Susp. | — | — |
| Seat | ✗ | — |
🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | — | — |
| Rear Brake | — | — |
| Front Lights | — | — |
| Rear Lights | — | — |
| Turn Signals | — | — |
| IP Rating | — | IP54 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✗ | — |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | — | — |
| OTA Updates | — | — |
| NFC Anti-Theft | — | — |
| GPS Tracking | — | — |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
Both scooters score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. For riders who prioritise speed, the Inokim OXO is the clear choice.
Inokim OXO vs VIVI PONY01 — Inokim OXO
The Inokim OXO (39/100) and VIVI PONY01 (37/100) score nearly the same overall. The Inokim OXO reaches 60 km/h top speed. See the spec table above for the full comparison.
