NIU KQi 100P vs Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
Why choose one over the other?
Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike leads overall (35 vs 30/100). NIU KQi 100P pulls ahead most on Portability (87 vs 25); Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike answers on Range (14 vs 10).
NIU KQi 100P costs $529 less; the pricier Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike justifies it only if its edge on Range matters to you.
NIU KQi 100P wins on
- •Portability: 87 vs 25
- •Safety: 42 vs 2
- •Tech: 40 vs 0
- •Comfort: 30 vs 0
- •Build Quality: 32 vs 10
- •Power & Speed: 16 vs 0
Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike wins on
- •Range: 14 vs 10
Choose the NIU KQi 100P if portability matters most; choose the Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike if you prioritise range.
| Spec | NIU KQi 100P | Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike |
|---|---|---|
⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 600 W | — |
| Continuous Power | 300 W | — |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 28 km/h ✓ | 25 km/h |
| Max Incline | 8.5 ° | — |
| Drive Config | Rear | — |
| Dual Motors | ✗ | — |
🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 243 Wh | 468 Wh ✓ |
| Amp Hours | 5.1 Ah | — |
| Charge Time | 6 h | — |
| Claimed Range | 29 km | 65 km ✓ |
| Cell Chemistry | Li-ion | — |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | — |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | — |
📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 17.3 kg ✓ | 28.1 kg |
| Max Payload | 120.2 kg | — |
| Deck Length | 43.7 cm | — |
| Deck Width | 13 cm | — |
| Ground Clearance | 7.9 cm | — |
| Foldable | ✓ | — |
🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 9.5" | — |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | — |
| Puncture Resistant | ✗ | — |
| Suspension | Front | — |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | — |
| Seat | ✗ | — |
🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Drum | — |
| Rear Brake | None | — |
| Front Lights | ✓ | — |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | — |
| Turn Signals | ✗ | — |
| IP Rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | — |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| OTA Updates | ✓ | — |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | — |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | — |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: tech — the NIU KQi 100P leads by 40 points. Both scooters score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. If range is your priority, the Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike will take you further per charge.
NIU KQi 100P vs Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike — NIU KQi 100P
The Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike scores higher overall (35 vs 30/100). The Touroll Touroll S3 Folding Fat Tire Electric Bike leads on claimed range (65 km vs 29 km for the NIU KQi 100P). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.
