Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar vs NIU KQi1 Pro
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
VS
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar wins overall — 72.7 vs 24.4 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar | NIU KQi1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 6.7 kW ✓ | 450 W |
| Continuous Power | 6.0 kW ✓ | 250 W |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 85.3 km/h ✓ | 24.9 km/h |
| Max Incline | 30 ° ✓ | 14 ° |
| Drive Config | Dual | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1800 Wh ✓ | 243 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 30 Ah ✓ | 5.1 Ah |
| Charge Time | — | 5 h |
| Claimed Range | 90.1 km ✓ | 24.9 km |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | ✓ |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 49.4 kg | 15.4 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 149.7 kg ✓ | 99.8 kg |
| Deck Length | — | 41.2 cm |
| Deck Width | — | 14.2 cm |
| Ground Clearance | 17.8 cm ✓ | 7.4 cm |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 11" ✓ | 9" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✓ | ✗ |
| Suspension | Dual | None |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | ✗ |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Disc | Drum |
| Rear Brake | Disc | None |
| Front Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | ✗ |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP54 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | ✗ | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | ✗ | ✓ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | ✗ |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the NIU KQi1 Pro. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar is the clear choice.
