Crowdsourced Data100% Free

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheel

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

Apollo Phantom 2.0

Apollo

Phantom 2.0

68
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
VS
FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheel

FluidFreeRide

Mercane WideWheel

29
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 67.9 vs 29.1 points

Why choose one over the other?

AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.

SpecApollo Phantom 2.0FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheel
Drivetrain
Peak Power3.5 kW
Continuous Power3.1 kW500 W
Max Torque
Top Speed70.8 km/h32 km/h
Max Incline25 °
Drive ConfigDualDual
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity1404 Wh720 Wh
Amp Hours27 Ah
Charge Time6 h
Claimed Range80.5 km50 km
Cell ChemistryLithium-ion
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight46.3 kg18 kg
Max Payload149.7 kg100 kg
Deck Length
Deck Width
Ground Clearance17.8 cm
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter11"10"
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
SuspensionDual
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front BrakeDiscNone
Rear BrakeDisc
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIP66
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: build quality — the Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads by 77 points. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheel. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheelApollo Phantom 2.0

The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scores higher overall (68 vs 29/100). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads on claimed range (81 km vs 50 km for the FluidFreeRide Mercane WideWheel). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.

More Comparisons