Crowdsourced Data100% Free

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin G2 Ultra

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

Apollo Phantom 2.0

Apollo

Phantom 2.0

68
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
VS
KuKirin G2 Ultra

KuKirin

G2 Ultra

35
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 67.9 vs 35.2 points

Why choose one over the other?

AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.

SpecApollo Phantom 2.0KuKirin G2 Ultra
Drivetrain
Peak Power3.5 kW
Continuous Power3.1 kW1.6 kW
Max Torque29 Nm
Top Speed70.8 km/h50 km/h
Max Incline25 °26 °
Drive ConfigDualDual
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity1404 Wh864 Wh
Amp Hours27 Ah18 Ah
Charge Time
Claimed Range80.5 km55 km
Cell ChemistryLithium-ionLithium-ion
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight46.3 kg30.4 kg
Max Payload149.7 kg120 kg
Deck Length125.8 cm
Deck Width65 cm
Ground Clearance17.8 cm16 cm
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter11"10"
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
SuspensionDualNone
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front BrakeDisc
Rear BrakeDisc
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIP66IPX4
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes3
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty12 months

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: build quality — the Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads by 65 points. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the KuKirin G2 Ultra. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin G2 UltraApollo Phantom 2.0

The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scores higher overall (68 vs 35/100). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads on claimed range (81 km vs 55 km for the KuKirin G2 Ultra). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.

More Comparisons