Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs Segway F25
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 69.4 vs 28.4 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | Apollo Phantom 2.0 | Segway F25 |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 3.5 kW ✓ | 300 W |
| Continuous Power | 3.1 kW ✓ | 300 W |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 70.8 km/h ✓ | 24.9 km/h |
| Max Incline | 25 ° ✓ | 10 ° |
| Drive Config | Dual | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1404 Wh ✓ | 183 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 27 Ah ✓ | 5.1 Ah |
| Charge Time | — | 3.5 h |
| Claimed Range | 80.5 km ✓ | 20 km |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Removable Battery | — | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | ✓ |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 46.3 kg | 14.7 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 149.7 kg ✓ | 117.9 kg |
| Deck Length | — | 48 cm |
| Deck Width | — | 17 cm |
| Ground Clearance | 17.8 cm ✓ | 9.9 cm |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 11" ✓ | 10" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✓ | ✗ |
| Suspension | Dual | None |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✗ | ✗ |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Disc | Drum |
| Rear Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Front Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | ✗ |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IPX5 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | ✗ | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | ✗ | ✓ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | ✗ | ✗ |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the Segway F25. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.
