ENGWE EP-2 Boost vs UNICRAFTER M3C

Side-by-side eBike comparison · Specs, scores & verdict

ENGWE EP-2 Boost

ENGWE

EP-2 Boost

38
Overall

$1,133

View full specs →
VS
UNICRAFTER M3C

UNICRAFTER

M3C

42
Overall

$561

View full specs →
Too close to call — scores within 5 points

Full Specs Comparison

Motor & Power

Hub-drive-rear
Motor Type
Hub-drive-rear
250 W
Nominal Power
750 W
55 Nm
Torque
Torque
Sensor Type
✗ No
Throttle
25.0 km/h
Max Assist Speed

🔋 Battery & Range

624 Wh
Battery Capacity
749 Wh
120 km
Claimed Range
90 km
✓ Yes
Removable Battery
✓ Yes
Integrated
Battery Position

🚲 Frame & Fit

Frame Material
Steel
30 kg
Weight
31 kg
150 kg
Max Payload
150 kg

🔧 Suspension

Rigid
Front Suspension
None
Rear Suspension

⚙️ Drivetrain & Brakes

7-speed
Gears
Derailleur
Drive System
Mechanical-disc
Brake Type
Mechanical-disc
180 mm
Rotor Size (F)
180 mm
Rotor Size (R)

🛞 Wheels & Tires

20.0"
Wheel Size
16.0"
4.00"
Tire Width
4.00"
Fat
Tire Type
Fat

📱 Tech & Features

Lcd
Display
None
Connectivity
Lights
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Rear Rack
✓ Yes
Fenders

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: motor — the UNICRAFTER M3C leads by 30 points. Both eBikes score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. If range is your priority, the ENGWE EP-2 Boost will take you further per charge.

ENGWE EP-2 Boost vs UNICRAFTER M3CENGWE EP-2 Boost

The UNICRAFTER M3C scores higher overall (42 vs 38/100). The ENGWE EP-2 Boost leads on claimed range (120 km vs 90 km for the UNICRAFTER M3C). The UNICRAFTER M3C is $572 cheaper.

More Comparisons