ENGWE EP-2 Boost vs UNICRAFTER M3C

Side-by-side eBike comparison · Specs, scores & verdict

ENGWE EP-2 Boost

ENGWE

EP-2 Boost

38
Overall

$1,133

View full specs →
VS
UNICRAFTER M3C

UNICRAFTER

M3C

42
Overall

$561

View full specs →
Too close to call — scores within 5 points

Full Specs Comparison

⚡ Motor & Power

Hub-drive-rear
Motor Type
Hub-drive-rear
250 W
Nominal Power
✓750 W
55 Nm✓
Torque
—
Torque
Sensor Type
—
✗ No
Throttle
—
25.0 km/h✓
Max Assist Speed
—

🔋 Battery & Range

624 Wh
Battery Capacity
✓749 Wh
120 km✓
Claimed Range
90 km
✓ Yes
Removable Battery
✓ Yes
Integrated
Battery Position
—

🚲 Frame & Fit

—
Frame Material
Steel
30 kg✓
Weight
31 kg
150 kg
Max Payload
150 kg

🔧 Suspension

Rigid
Front Suspension
—
None
Rear Suspension
—

⚙️ Drivetrain & Brakes

7-speed✓
Gears
—
Derailleur
Drive System
—
Mechanical-disc
Brake Type
Mechanical-disc
180 mm✓
Rotor Size (F)
—
180 mm✓
Rotor Size (R)
—

🛞 Wheels & Tires

20.0"
Wheel Size
16.0"
4.00"
Tire Width
4.00"
Fat
Tire Type
Fat

📱 Tech & Features

Lcd
Display
—
None
Connectivity
—
—
Lights
✓✓ Yes
✓ Yes✓
Rear Rack
—
✓ Yes✓
Fenders
—

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: motor — the UNICRAFTER M3C leads by 29 points. Both eBikes score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. If range is your priority, the ENGWE EP-2 Boost will take you further per charge.

ENGWE EP-2 Boost vs UNICRAFTER M3C — ENGWE EP-2 Boost

The UNICRAFTER M3C scores higher overall (42 vs 38/100). The ENGWE EP-2 Boost leads on claimed range (120 km vs 90 km for the UNICRAFTER M3C). The UNICRAFTER M3C is $572 cheaper.

More Comparisons