Apollo Pro vs Gotrax Apex
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 Apollo Pro wins overall — 73.9 vs 25.7 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | Apollo Pro | Gotrax Apex |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 6.0 kW | — |
| Continuous Power | 2.4 kW ✓ | 250 W |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 70 km/h ✓ | 24.9 km/h |
| Max Incline | 30 ° ✓ | 15 ° |
| Drive Config | Dual | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1560 Wh ✓ | 216 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 30 Ah ✓ | 6 Ah |
| Charge Time | 6 h | — |
| Claimed Range | 99.8 km ✓ | 24.9 km |
| Cell Chemistry | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✓ | ✓ |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 42.2 kg | 14.5 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 149.7 kg ✓ | 99.8 kg |
| Deck Length | 47 cm | 47 cm |
| Deck Width | 23.6 cm ✓ | 15.2 cm |
| Ground Clearance | 15 cm ✓ | 10.2 cm |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 12" ✓ | 8.5" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | ✓ | ✗ |
| Suspension | Dual | None |
| Adjustable Susp. | ✓ | ✗ |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Drum | Disc |
| Rear Brake | Drum | Disc |
| Front Lights | — | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | ✓ | ✗ |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IPX4 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✓ | ✗ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | ✗ | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | ✓ | ✗ |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: comfort — the Apollo Pro leads by 83 points. The Apollo Pro pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the Gotrax Apex. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Pro is the clear choice.
Apollo Pro vs Gotrax Apex — Apollo Pro
The Apollo Pro scores higher overall (74 vs 26/100). The Apollo Pro leads on claimed range (100 km vs 25 km for the Gotrax Apex). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.
