APEFOX T90 vs Ausom DT2 Pro
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
🏆 Ausom DT2 Pro wins overall — 55.6 vs 50.5 points
Why choose one over the other?
AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.
| Spec | APEFOX T90 | Ausom DT2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | 6.0 kW ✓ | 2.9 kW |
| Continuous Power | 4.2 kW ✓ | 2.2 kW |
| Max Torque | — | 64 Nm |
| Top Speed | 85 km/h ✓ | 68 km/h |
| Max Incline | — | 53 ° |
| Drive Config | Dual | Dual |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1872 Wh ✓ | 1217 Wh |
| Amp Hours | 31.2 Ah ✓ | 23.4 Ah |
| Charge Time | 7.5 h ✓ | 12 h |
| Claimed Range | 100 km | 115 km ✓ |
| Cell Chemistry | — | Lithium-ion |
| Removable Battery | — | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | — | ✓ |
| 📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 54.2 kg | 33.5 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 150 kg ✓ | 135 kg |
| Deck Length | — | 52.5 cm |
| Deck Width | — | 18 cm |
| Ground Clearance | — | 17.8 cm |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 13" ✓ | 10" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | — | ✓ |
| Suspension | Dual | Dual |
| Adjustable Susp. | — | ✓ |
| Seat | — | ✗ |
| 🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brake | Disc | Disc |
| Front Lights | — | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | — | ✓ |
| IP Rating | IPX5 | IP54 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
| 📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | — | — |
| Riding Modes | — | 3 |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | — | — |
| NFC Anti-Theft | — | ✓ |
| GPS Tracking | — | — |
| Warranty | 12 months | 24 months ✓ |
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: tech — the Ausom DT2 Pro leads by 50 points. The Ausom DT2 Pro edges out the APEFOX T90 on our overall score, though both are competitive options. For riders who prioritise speed, the APEFOX T90 is the clear choice.
APEFOX T90 vs Ausom DT2 Pro — APEFOX T90
The Ausom DT2 Pro scores higher overall (56 vs 50/100). The APEFOX T90 reaches 85 km/h top speed. See the spec table above for the full comparison.
