Crowdsourced Data100% Free

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin M4 Max

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

Apollo Phantom 2.0

Apollo

Phantom 2.0

68
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
VS
KuKirin M4 Max

KuKirin

M4 Max

38
Overall

$879

View full specs →
🏆 Apollo Phantom 2.0 wins overall — 67.9 vs 37.9 points

Why choose one over the other?

AI comparison analysis coming soon. Our team is reviewing this matchup.

SpecApollo Phantom 2.0KuKirin M4 Max
Drivetrain
Peak Power3.5 kW
Continuous Power3.1 kW800 W
Max Torque27.1 Nm
Top Speed70.8 km/h45 km/h
Max Incline25 °20 °
Drive ConfigDual
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity1404 Wh874 Wh
Amp Hours27 Ah18.2 Ah
Charge Time
Claimed Range80.5 km64 km
Cell ChemistryLithium-ionLithium-ion
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight46.3 kg24 kg
Max Payload149.7 kg120 kg
Deck Length
Deck Width
Ground Clearance17.8 cm13.5 cm
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter11"10"
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
SuspensionDual
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front BrakeDisc
Rear BrakeDisc
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIP66IP54
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes3
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty12 months

📝 Our Verdict

The biggest measurable difference: comfort — the Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads by 64 points. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 pulls ahead significantly with a higher overall score than the KuKirin M4 Max. For riders who prioritise speed, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the clear choice.

Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs KuKirin M4 MaxApollo Phantom 2.0

The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scores higher overall (68 vs 38/100). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 leads on claimed range (81 km vs 64 km for the KuKirin M4 Max). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.

More Comparisons