HEADEER BD2640 vs UNICRAFTER M3C
Side-by-side eBike comparison · Specs, scores & verdict
Too close to call — scores within 5 points
Full Specs Comparison
⚡ Motor & Power
Hub-drive-rear
Motor Type
Hub-drive-rear
750 W
Nominal Power
750 W
45.0 km/h✓
Max Assist Speed
—
🔋 Battery & Range
1037 Wh✓
Battery Capacity
749 Wh
80 km
Claimed Range
✓90 km
✓ Yes
Removable Battery
✓ Yes
🚲 Frame & Fit
Step-over
Frame Style
—
Steel
Frame Material
Steel
36.1 kg
Weight
✓31 kg
150 kg
Max Payload
150 kg
🔧 Suspension
None
Rear Suspension
—
⚙️ Drivetrain & Brakes
7-speed✓
Gears
—
Mechanical-disc
Brake Type
Mechanical-disc
🛞 Wheels & Tires
26.0"
Wheel Size
16.0"
4.00"
Tire Width
4.00"
Fat
Tire Type
Fat
📱 Tech & Features
Color
Display
—
None
Connectivity
—
✓ Yes
Lights
✓ Yes
✓ Yes✓
Rear Rack
—
✓ Yes✓
Fenders
—
📝 Our Verdict
The biggest measurable difference: tech — the HEADEER BD2640 leads by 30 points. Both eBikes score closely overall, making this a genuine toss-up on raw performance. For portability and easy handling, the UNICRAFTER M3C is the better pick.
HEADEER BD2640 vs UNICRAFTER M3C — HEADEER BD2640
The HEADEER BD2640 (44/100) and UNICRAFTER M3C (42/100) score nearly the same overall. The UNICRAFTER M3C is $367 cheaper.
