Inokim OXO vs NIU KQi3 Pro

Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict

🛴

Inokim

OXO

42
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
VS
NIU KQi3 Pro

NIU

KQi3 Pro

39
Overall

Price TBA

View full specs →
Too close to call — scores within 5 points

Why choose one over the other?

Reasons to choose Inokim OXO

  • Longer range: 70 km vs 49.9 km
  • Higher top speed: 60 km/h vs 32.2 km/h
  • Larger battery capacity: 1540 Wh vs 487 Wh

Reasons to choose NIU KQi3 Pro

  • Lighter weight: 20.3 kg vs 33.5 kg
  • Faster charge time: 6 h vs 12 h
  • Front/rear disc brakes and IP54 rating vs unspecified brakes and no rating
SpecInokim OXONIU KQi3 Pro
Drivetrain
Peak Power700 W
Continuous Power1.0 kW350 W
Max Torque
Top Speed60 km/h32.2 km/h
Max Incline
Drive ConfigDualRear
Dual Motors
🔋 Battery & Range
Battery Capacity1540 Wh487 Wh
Amp Hours10.1 Ah
Charge Time12 h6 h
Claimed Range70 km49.9 km
Cell ChemistryLithium-ion
Removable Battery
Regen Braking
📐 Size & Portability
Weight33.5 kg20.3 kg
Max Payload120 kg120.2 kg
Deck Length50.8 cm
Deck Width17.3 cm
Ground Clearance6.4 cm
Foldable
🛤️ Ride Comfort
Wheel Diameter10"9.5"
Pneumatic Tires
Puncture Resistant
SuspensionNone
Adjustable Susp.
Seat
🛡️ Safety
Front BrakeDisc
Rear BrakeDisc
Front Lights
Rear Lights
Turn Signals
IP RatingIP54
Kids' Scooter
📱 Tech & Smart
Companion App
Riding Modes
Cruise Control
OTA Updates
NFC Anti-Theft
GPS Tracking
Warranty

📝 Our Verdict

Riders needing high speed and long-range capabilities should choose the Inokim OXO with its 60 km/h top speed, 70 km range, and 1540 Wh battery. Those prioritizing portability, quick charging, and robust safety features will prefer the NIU KQi3 Pro, thanks to its 20.3 kg weight, 6 h charge time, dual disc brakes, and IP54 rating.

More Comparisons