Inokim OXO vs NIU KQi3 Pro
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
Too close to call — scores within 5 points
Why choose one over the other?
Reasons to choose Inokim OXO
- •Longer range: 70 km vs 49.9 km
- •Higher top speed: 60 km/h vs 32.2 km/h
- •Larger battery capacity: 1540 Wh vs 487 Wh
Reasons to choose NIU KQi3 Pro
- •Lighter weight: 20.3 kg vs 33.5 kg
- •Faster charge time: 6 h vs 12 h
- •Front/rear disc brakes and IP54 rating vs unspecified brakes and no rating
| Spec | Inokim OXO | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | — | 700 W |
| Continuous Power | 1.0 kW ✓ | 350 W |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 60 km/h ✓ | 32.2 km/h |
| Max Incline | — | — |
| Drive Config | Dual | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1540 Wh ✓ | 487 Wh |
| Amp Hours | — | 10.1 Ah |
| Charge Time | 12 h | 6 h ✓ |
| Claimed Range | 70 km ✓ | 49.9 km |
| Cell Chemistry | — | Li-ion |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✗ | ✓ |
📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 33.5 kg | 20.3 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 120 kg | 120.2 kg ✓ |
| Deck Length | — | 50.8 cm |
| Deck Width | — | 17.3 cm |
| Ground Clearance | — | 6.4 cm |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 10" ✓ | 9.5" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | — | ✗ |
| Suspension | — | None |
| Adjustable Susp. | — | ✗ |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | — | Disc |
| Rear Brake | — | Disc |
| Front Lights | — | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | — | ✗ |
| IP Rating | — | IP54 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✗ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | — | ✓ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | — | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | — | ✗ |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
Riders needing high speed and long-range capabilities should choose the Inokim OXO with its 60 km/h top speed, 70 km range, and 1540 Wh battery. Those prioritizing portability, quick charging, and robust safety features will prefer the NIU KQi3 Pro, thanks to its 20.3 kg weight, 6 h charge time, dual disc brakes, and IP54 rating.
Inokim OXO vs NIU KQi3 Pro — Inokim OXO
The Inokim OXO (39/100) and NIU KQi3 Pro (37/100) score nearly the same overall. The Inokim OXO leads on claimed range (70 km vs 50 km for the NIU KQi3 Pro).
