Inokim OXO vs NIU KQi3 Pro
Side-by-side comparison · Specs, scores & AI verdict
Too close to call — scores within 5 points
Why choose one over the other?
Reasons to choose Inokim OXO
- •Longer range: 70 km vs 49.9 km
- •Higher top speed: 60 km/h vs 32.2 km/h
- •Larger battery capacity: 1540 Wh vs 487 Wh
Reasons to choose NIU KQi3 Pro
- •Lighter weight: 20.3 kg vs 33.5 kg
- •Faster charge time: 6 h vs 12 h
- •Front/rear disc brakes and IP54 rating vs unspecified brakes and no rating
| Spec | Inokim OXO | NIU KQi3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
⚡ Drivetrain | ||
| Peak Power | — | 700 W |
| Continuous Power | 1.0 kW ✓ | 350 W |
| Max Torque | — | — |
| Top Speed | 60 km/h ✓ | 32.2 km/h |
| Max Incline | — | — |
| Drive Config | Dual | Rear |
| Dual Motors | ✓ | ✗ |
🔋 Battery & Range | ||
| Battery Capacity | 1540 Wh ✓ | 487 Wh |
| Amp Hours | — | 10.1 Ah |
| Charge Time | 12 h | 6 h ✓ |
| Claimed Range | 70 km ✓ | 49.9 km |
| Cell Chemistry | — | Li-ion |
| Removable Battery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Regen Braking | ✗ | ✓ |
📐 Size & Portability | ||
| Weight | 33.5 kg | 20.3 kg ✓ |
| Max Payload | 120 kg | 120.2 kg ✓ |
| Deck Length | — | 50.8 cm |
| Deck Width | — | 17.3 cm |
| Ground Clearance | — | 6.4 cm |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
🛤️ Ride Comfort | ||
| Wheel Diameter | 10" ✓ | 9.5" |
| Pneumatic Tires | ✓ | ✓ |
| Puncture Resistant | — | ✗ |
| Suspension | — | None |
| Adjustable Susp. | — | ✗ |
| Seat | ✗ | ✗ |
🛡️ Safety | ||
| Front Brake | — | Disc |
| Rear Brake | — | Disc |
| Front Lights | — | ✓ |
| Rear Lights | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signals | — | ✗ |
| IP Rating | — | IP54 |
| Kids' Scooter | ||
📱 Tech & Smart | ||
| Companion App | ✗ | ✓ |
| Riding Modes | — | — |
| Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| OTA Updates | — | ✓ |
| NFC Anti-Theft | — | ✗ |
| GPS Tracking | — | ✗ |
| Warranty | — | — |
📝 Our Verdict
Riders needing high speed and long-range capabilities should choose the Inokim OXO with its 60 km/h top speed, 70 km range, and 1540 Wh battery. Those prioritizing portability, quick charging, and robust safety features will prefer the NIU KQi3 Pro, thanks to its 20.3 kg weight, 6 h charge time, dual disc brakes, and IP54 rating.
Inokim OXO vs NIU KQi3 Pro — Inokim OXO
The Inokim OXO (39/100) and NIU KQi3 Pro (37/100) score nearly the same overall. The Inokim OXO leads on claimed range (70 km vs 50 km for the NIU KQi3 Pro). Check the spec table above for the full breakdown.
